Free the nipple? 15 comments
guest_
· 1 year ago
If you go out in leggings, you can’t control wether people look and lust after you. Some people wear long shirts or wrap their waists etc- but at the end of the day you can’t control it.
Now to be clear I am not arguing that women shouldn’t wear certain things- I believe people should be able to dress as they like and the place I grew up didn’t criminalize public nudity so people could sometimes be seen walking naked or near naked.
I’m also not defending those who leer and sexualize others.
The point is that no jut laws on earth with present technology Can police wether someone is staring intentionally or wether they are sexualizing something or not.
We can work to create social stigma and values that teach people it is wrong or impolite to sexualize or stare at others, especially specific to things like breast feeding- but that’s about it unless we want a world where you can be locked up under suspicion of lewd thoughts or for looking at someone in public.
Now to be clear I am not arguing that women shouldn’t wear certain things- I believe people should be able to dress as they like and the place I grew up didn’t criminalize public nudity so people could sometimes be seen walking naked or near naked.
I’m also not defending those who leer and sexualize others.
The point is that no jut laws on earth with present technology Can police wether someone is staring intentionally or wether they are sexualizing something or not.
We can work to create social stigma and values that teach people it is wrong or impolite to sexualize or stare at others, especially specific to things like breast feeding- but that’s about it unless we want a world where you can be locked up under suspicion of lewd thoughts or for looking at someone in public.
Free the nipple? 15 comments
guest_
· 1 year ago
It is a fundamental and multifaceted problem.
We cannot police people’s thoughts. We can have anti discrimination laws but those laws don’t change wether a boss or shop keeper Harbor certain feelings or ideas about you, they just act to mitigate their ability to impede your life or give you recourse.
You can’t stop simple from fantasizing about you. Every one of us- no matter how undesirable you think you might be or how much you try to not appear “provocatively,” someone you pass by could masturbate to you later. You can’t stop it and you may never know.
Using women as an example- in most societies fashion has become less restrictive and more revealing in modern times.
We’ve mostly normalized things like crop tops, short shorts, skirts, leggings and “work out” or “functional” apparel- which some refuse to wear and others argue is essentially the same as walking around naked.
We cannot police people’s thoughts. We can have anti discrimination laws but those laws don’t change wether a boss or shop keeper Harbor certain feelings or ideas about you, they just act to mitigate their ability to impede your life or give you recourse.
You can’t stop simple from fantasizing about you. Every one of us- no matter how undesirable you think you might be or how much you try to not appear “provocatively,” someone you pass by could masturbate to you later. You can’t stop it and you may never know.
Using women as an example- in most societies fashion has become less restrictive and more revealing in modern times.
We’ve mostly normalized things like crop tops, short shorts, skirts, leggings and “work out” or “functional” apparel- which some refuse to wear and others argue is essentially the same as walking around naked.
Imagine the library of alexandria 7 comments
guest_
· 1 year ago
Of the 1% we have most people have never and will never read it, and only a fraction of those who have read it understand it save perhaps for reading someone else’s synopsis of it.
1
grand 3 comments
guest_
· 1 year ago
Lol. I think you’re right about the fractions being a major force behind non metric hate. Given the choice I generally will try to avoid fractions, though they can always convert to decimals.
Kohmedy fillosuffee 1 comments
guest_
· 1 year ago
But Mr. Cleese- who decides who has a sense of humor? It seems that you and many likeminded people would determine that based off wether someone laughs at the same things you do or not. Is it at all possible that perhaps one can have a sense of humor and still have some threshold for appropriateness? If one were to bang your spouse and mother at once and you were to catch them, would you laugh and be in good spirits seeing the humor in the situation? Maybe your sense of humor isn’t the one to use a bench mark, or perhaps you have a shit sense of humor? Or perhaps people can have different senses of humor. The fictional Joker from Batman is a guy who is built around a sense of humor but I doubt you’d enjoy being on the recieving end of his humor.
▼
Bloody 1 comments
guest_
· 1 year ago
What I love most about this? Rare steak is easier to digest than well done steak. One can look it up rather easily in the Information Age, along with several other reasons why well done meat can be more harmful to your health than medium rare.
There is an extra layer in humor in picturing someone trying to tear down something someone else likes by listing the ways it makes you mentally less able… by making a meme that is factually wrong and a list that actually applies better to the authors states preference.
There is an extra layer in humor in picturing someone trying to tear down something someone else likes by listing the ways it makes you mentally less able… by making a meme that is factually wrong and a list that actually applies better to the authors states preference.
grand 3 comments
guest_
· 1 year ago
I am very uncomfortable with how many people would smugly laugh at this but would also nod along or post moaning about never being taught how to do taxes.
As the opening to the film “Armageddon” saliently warns us: “It has happened before, it will happen again” <sic>
As the opening to the film “Armageddon” saliently warns us: “It has happened before, it will happen again” <sic>
Fiat is truth and crypto is a scam, now pay tax on your scamcoin... In fiat 2 comments
guest_
· 1 year ago
While bemoaning taces has long been popular, and it has had a resurgence in coolness lately, simply speaking not paying taxes is a freeloaders way of thinking. You live within a system and benefit from that system. It is reasonable to expect that one would contribute back to that system unless one is a parasite who just wants to take whatever they can get.
Now it is more than fair to say you have issues with HOW the money gets spent. In theory it all goes to a public hood but in practice there is corruption, waste, and foolish spending as well as decisions you may not agree with.
Those issues are administrative issues to be worked out separately and do not change the principle behind taxes and how budgets work in a democracy. Vote smarter and be more involved if you want to do something.
·
Edited 1 year ago
Now it is more than fair to say you have issues with HOW the money gets spent. In theory it all goes to a public hood but in practice there is corruption, waste, and foolish spending as well as decisions you may not agree with.
Those issues are administrative issues to be worked out separately and do not change the principle behind taxes and how budgets work in a democracy. Vote smarter and be more involved if you want to do something.
Fiat is truth and crypto is a scam, now pay tax on your scamcoin... In fiat 2 comments
guest_
· 1 year ago
This seems to forget all the people who have been scammed or lost it all in crypto bubbles.
Given that one can write off losses in crypto on their US taxes, it would seem pretty fair that one would be assessed gains as well.
Of course, even if/when you can’t write off a loss, there is the underlying fact that conducting commerce within the jurisdiction of a given country almost always relies upon tangible or intangible benefits provided by that country.
Infrastructure like roads, telecommunications, etc. or directly or indirectly through a nations general wealth and security- providing an environment conducive to commerce.
Given that one can write off losses in crypto on their US taxes, it would seem pretty fair that one would be assessed gains as well.
Of course, even if/when you can’t write off a loss, there is the underlying fact that conducting commerce within the jurisdiction of a given country almost always relies upon tangible or intangible benefits provided by that country.
Infrastructure like roads, telecommunications, etc. or directly or indirectly through a nations general wealth and security- providing an environment conducive to commerce.
I don't know what Chaplin did and at this point I'm to afraid to ask 5 comments
guest_
· 1 year ago
So would god forgive Hitler? I find it dubious but I wouldn’t presume to speak for god. The idea of a man like that being forgiven doesn’t sit well, it’s uncomfortable and problematic. But- within most Christian doctrines- being forgiven in the afterlife is possible for just about anyone.
I don't know what Chaplin did and at this point I'm to afraid to ask 5 comments
guest_
· 1 year ago
That doesn’t mean that what a person did in life is forgotten, it doesn’t make them a “good person” in the eyes of others.
It also ignores concepts like purgatory which exist in various sects of Christianity as a possible middle step- that one doesn’t simply die and get into “heaven” or “hell” in all cases, but that one can spend hundreds, thousands, billions of years in a state of quasi punishment and waiting. Trapped.
Often the stay in purgatory is tied to sins in life, with either all sins or sins not repented at times of death each having some “sentence” attached. Given what we know of the man it is likely if purgatory exists that Adolf Hitler would likely be there for some extreme and unfathomable amount of time if he didn’t go straight to hell. In such a length of time it might be possible to repent genuinely and not merely regret that your actions have caused you to suffer.
It also ignores concepts like purgatory which exist in various sects of Christianity as a possible middle step- that one doesn’t simply die and get into “heaven” or “hell” in all cases, but that one can spend hundreds, thousands, billions of years in a state of quasi punishment and waiting. Trapped.
Often the stay in purgatory is tied to sins in life, with either all sins or sins not repented at times of death each having some “sentence” attached. Given what we know of the man it is likely if purgatory exists that Adolf Hitler would likely be there for some extreme and unfathomable amount of time if he didn’t go straight to hell. In such a length of time it might be possible to repent genuinely and not merely regret that your actions have caused you to suffer.
I don't know what Chaplin did and at this point I'm to afraid to ask 5 comments
guest_
· 1 year ago
“Say sorry” or “trick” their way into heaven. Therefore IF Adolf Hitler were to go to Christian heaven, Adolf Hitler would need to genuinely and completely be repentant of his actions. Which again- seems highly unlikely, but with that said a general Tennant of Christianity is to forgive those who genuinely repent. The concept of the afterlife in Christianity is eternal, and thusly anything that happens on Earth, the entire existence of the universe, is a tiny blip comparatively.
Meaning that it would be entirely the prerogative of monotheistic all powerful all knowing deity who they forgive and why, and their decision making ability would be most likely beyond human comprehension.
Meaning that it would be entirely the prerogative of monotheistic all powerful all knowing deity who they forgive and why, and their decision making ability would be most likely beyond human comprehension.
I don't know what Chaplin did and at this point I'm to afraid to ask 5 comments
guest_
· 1 year ago
.. the consequences of his actions. I find it highly unlikely that Adolf Hitler would meet the general requirements set by Christianity for admittance to heaven. It is verifiably true that Hitler would not meet the requirements of certain sects of Christianity due to his deeds or adherences he failed to hold.
With that said, the concept of forgiveness after death even if those who have done horrifying wrong is not exclusive to Christianity. Many religions and spiritual or philosophical views hold that a dead person is… dead. Gone from this Earth and that it is up to the living to keep living.
With all that said is it theoretically possible at least under some Christian belief systems that Adolf Hitler went to heaven? Perhaps.
That said Christian god is a monotheistic “all knowing, all powerful” deity. You can’t “trick” Christian god by Christian belief. Therefore if Christian god were real and assuming thusly that Christian perceptions of their god are correct, one can’t simply
With that said, the concept of forgiveness after death even if those who have done horrifying wrong is not exclusive to Christianity. Many religions and spiritual or philosophical views hold that a dead person is… dead. Gone from this Earth and that it is up to the living to keep living.
With all that said is it theoretically possible at least under some Christian belief systems that Adolf Hitler went to heaven? Perhaps.
That said Christian god is a monotheistic “all knowing, all powerful” deity. You can’t “trick” Christian god by Christian belief. Therefore if Christian god were real and assuming thusly that Christian perceptions of their god are correct, one can’t simply
I don't know what Chaplin did and at this point I'm to afraid to ask 5 comments
guest_
· 1 year ago
A real shame as it would turn a “wholesome Christian meme” into some sort of Nazi propaganda but fail entirely as an indictment of Christianity.
There are countless permutations of Christianity, some requiring elaborate rituals and adherences to gain admittance to heaven and some not. Some having concepts like “mortal sin” that can require specific penance to absolve and others not. The closest thing that Christianity has to a universal rule on the matter is some belief in god and/or Jesus OR non belief but adherence to the principles of Christian living. Neither condition is likely to apply to Adolf Hitler by most accounts.
It is possible that Adolf Hitler may have met one of these conditions, but the next thing that is close to universal throughout Christianity is that one must make a firm, sincere, complete repentance of misdeeds and sins to be forgiven. Contextually it seems unlikely that Adolf Hitler did so as Hitler killed himself, most likely to avoid facing…
There are countless permutations of Christianity, some requiring elaborate rituals and adherences to gain admittance to heaven and some not. Some having concepts like “mortal sin” that can require specific penance to absolve and others not. The closest thing that Christianity has to a universal rule on the matter is some belief in god and/or Jesus OR non belief but adherence to the principles of Christian living. Neither condition is likely to apply to Adolf Hitler by most accounts.
It is possible that Adolf Hitler may have met one of these conditions, but the next thing that is close to universal throughout Christianity is that one must make a firm, sincere, complete repentance of misdeeds and sins to be forgiven. Contextually it seems unlikely that Adolf Hitler did so as Hitler killed himself, most likely to avoid facing…
You probably would have been that child that dies and takes his mother's life during 12 comments
guest_
· 1 year ago
So I mean… it is possible some people would enjoy and do well at some past points of history, it is possible that some people might like it if the modern world adopted certain things from various points in history. The majority of people probably not so much. In short it tends to be a case of “the grass is always greener on the other side of the fence.”
You probably would have been that child that dies and takes his mother's life during 12 comments
guest_
· 1 year ago
Going back less than 100 years might not make communication that difficult in a broad sense that you could probably understand people and conduct essential conversations, but you’d likely speak strangely to them and vice versa, you’d likely seem odd, and there would be issues most likely in general communications the more integrated you were into society and the more you interacted. Go back much further and things become much worse generally. Beyond spoken language are unspoken communications. Manners, customs, laws, so many things that the further from your own time and culture you get the more it becomes likely that you would quite possibly or most certainly get yourself into various trouble even if you could form and understand sentences like a native.
You probably would have been that child that dies and takes his mother's life during 12 comments
guest_
· 1 year ago
Language is a huge one- even if you could travel to Ancient Rome do you think you could speak to them or read or write? Even if you have some knowledge of the language of a place, time changes language and even if you knew the classical form are you fluent enough to not seem like an imbecile? Would you get the puns and cultural references and humor and slang and nuances? Probably not. You don’t have to even go far back in time within a native spoken language that still is in common usage to begin to have such problems. We tend to take for granted and not realize how much of many languages like English are very modern. No, they did not speak like you in the 1940’s. Many common sayings and idioms and such didn’t exist then in English. There are many that aren’t commonly know to the average speaker that were common then.
You probably would have been that child that dies and takes his mother's life during 12 comments
guest_
· 1 year ago
But the thing is that even if you fit in another time, if their values and beliefs are more aligned to yours and you are in a group that wasn’t socially or otherwise in a bad spot in general- even if you weren’t in a position to be at the bottom of the socio economic ladder and such.. you’d probably not like it or be liked much. The odds that your values truly align are slim and the context of the culture and such are very unlikely- even someone with a PHD in the society and life of a period would likely have trouble fitting in and would tend to need to walk on eggshells not to make some slip up because they are used to living in this world with its many differences and things that don’t exist or haven’t happened.
You probably would have been that child that dies and takes his mother's life during 12 comments
guest_
· 1 year ago
Should the day come that almost everything is downloaded and printed at home many kids right now might be adults or old geezers like me and you might not think printing everything is as cool as it sounds. You might bemoan the disconnection or the loss of certain experiences or feel uneasy in the new rules the world works by. You may have trouble understanding and keeping up with the “simple” technology your kids seem to get intuitively. If the world becomes vastly more conservative many people will likely pibe for the “golden age of liberalism” they may see our time as from their vantage, and the world could become so liberal that even radical liberals of today would feel confused and morally outraged or upset. And one day you or your kids or their kids might talk about the golden 2020’s and how good we all had it and how great it would be to live right now- and if you’re still around you might agree or you might cackle at their ignorance.
You probably would have been that child that dies and takes his mother's life during 12 comments
guest_
· 1 year ago
we’re more effort- but it was just how it was. Maybe in 20,50 years or less we will have some technology that makes modern internet and cell phones look cumbersome and primitive. Someday maybe we will have some sort of technological telepathy. Who knows- but people today just live mostly fine with why there is today, we might fantasize about how things could be better but it generally doesn’t ruin our lives. Someday every home may have high grade industrial 3D printers and the thought of needing to wait for things in the mail or for a delivery will seem like a big deal. People will just print whatever they want and pay a subscription or for downloads or whatever the model might be. But as cool as that sounds, today, you live in this world and are used to it.
You probably would have been that child that dies and takes his mother's life during 12 comments
guest_
· 1 year ago
A lot of it is relative to the person. The fact is just like people have often looked backwards or forwards in time and yearned for a “better time” there are people in just about every single time who have been happy and content. They’ve lived good lives by their standards. I mean hell- a lot of us still alive grew up before internet and cellular phones and many modern conveniences. The world today is much different and some things we like and some things many of us dislike. Some of us would gladly go back and others wouldn’t trade what we’ve gained- but we lived before internet and such and many of us were perfectly happy. Of course there were inconveniences that aren’t so big a thing today- if the store didn’t have it you could MAYBE order it or you were stuck with what they had. If you didn’t live near certain things you just didn’t have access generally. We couldn’t “instantly comunícate” in the same ways and had to use paper forms and such. Mail things, many things took longer and
You probably would have been that child that dies and takes his mother's life during 12 comments
guest_
· 1 year ago
So some people really might be happier or at least fit in better in another time. If you’re a person who holds religious beliefs that don’t allow you to take advantage of modern medicine- you probably won’t miss a world without it. Through much of time and history there is some group of people, usually males, who generally had things better, and if you happen to be a member of a group that had it better then a certain time might appeal to you if you aren’t too hung up on the way others are treated and only care about your own life.
If you don’t know much about things like science or technology you might not mind being in a time where people knew less about those things. If you don’t watch Tv much or use the internet much… etc etc. so I can’t say the past is always such a bad place.
If you don’t know much about things like science or technology you might not mind being in a time where people knew less about those things. If you don’t watch Tv much or use the internet much… etc etc. so I can’t say the past is always such a bad place.
You probably would have been that child that dies and takes his mother's life during 12 comments
guest_
· 1 year ago
It is also often the case as we age that the past looks better. A combination of factors conspire between our own changing perceptions and the changing world. We get used to things and then they are gone because of change. Of course our logical minds will often correct us- those “bygone days” weren’t that great right? So we often go to times before our own- again- it’s that “the thing we can’t relate to” seeming better than the thing we know.
You probably would have been that child that dies and takes his mother's life during 12 comments
guest_
· 1 year ago
It all depends I suppose, on what your world view is and what you can live without. One constant in history is people of any time period thinking one in the past was better. We aren’t the first generation to dream of being knights or Romans- in fact in both cases those things were Romanticized essentially right after their falls from prominence- and with both knights and Romans, within the time those were common things people romanticized earlier versions of them. Married people often lament how lucky their unmarried friends are for things like freedom or financial autonomy and single people often bemoan how lucky those in relationships are. As humans we tend to be short sighted, if we aren’t happy or think we could be happier we will often assume that if we had the things we don’t have that we would be- and we often project the things we want.
Don’t open a stable if you are afraid of horses amigo. Some women would never dream of going out in a halter top- even if it is more normalized some men would never go shirtless in public if it could be helped. People wear tshirts to the pool etc.
the “simple” solution and the just one is for people to not stare or not be creeps- but my argument isn’t that shouldn’t be the way things are- my argument is that it isn’t the way things are.