Or you just don’t have very nice balls- or aren’t dating “ball women” who appreciate a good set.

Quite some debate on the topic. Without supporting or rebuking AI creations I can say this- in the original film the robot “checked” will smith by asking “can you?” It is an interesting question, not just because he is calling smiths character out on his lack of creative talent, but because there tend to be certain formulas to things. There are generally two main types of creators like artists and musicians- those which follow a set of prescribed rules and their art is largely judged on their ability to follow those rules, and those which intuitively follow a set of unwritten or yet discovered rules. This is part of what is often scoffed at in “modern” or “surrealist” and other styles of non traditional art.

Our world of words is most profound.
It seems impossible, but it is not impossible to produce such sentences which hold within them no presence of the prescribed letter.
One might build lengthy, verbose prose without ever needing to use the letter in question.
No trickery is required or short or incomplete sentences. If you check you will find entire books written without this letter or several others, in some instances concurrently multiple vowels omitted, check it out. Quite interesting indeed.

Function has little in general to do with perception or preference. People often say they feel “safer” in tall vehicles despite the disadvantages of physics inherent to the design. Breast size has no correlation to milk production, heath, or fertility and breasts serve basically no functional benefit and are almost entirely a detriment asides from aesthetic preference. Men on the whole still seem to like breasts no? This is a touch like the guy who talks about how much smarter he is than the guy a woman likes and how foolish and dishonest she is to say she finds intelligence attractive; only to be informed that generally finding intelligence attractive doesn’t mean you want a guy who is a walking encyclopedia of random facts- it means you want a man with the intelligence to know how to materialize desire into reality and navigate life.

Generally you don’t need the gun to protect yourself from someone who is protecting themselves with a gun- the idea is more that you need the gun to protect yourself from the person who has a gun to do harm- such as crime, or to protect yourself from gangs and groups of thugs who don’t have guns but outnumber you. Enter the cliche paradox that outlawing guns would then just largely mean that outlaws would have guns since they traditionally… don’t follow the law. Now- the argument holds that outlawing guns would most likely reduce the amount of guns in the hands of outlaws. That may or may not be true. Outlawing drugs has not seemed to decrease the amount of drugs in the country or access to drugs.

Useless? Hardly. Kazuma starts out as a shit in neet with serious unresolved issues. He squandered his life away in our world before dying and speculatively would have probably squandered his reincarnation as well…
That is if not for these three. Kazuma arrives in the fantasy world to find it is not what he envisioned or his media had prepared him for. His first acts are to join the guild and find out he is not spectacular in stats, and then work a construction job. Aqua gained the coins used to register but maybe kazuma would have worked that out alone- that said however, it is the presence of Aqua that helps attract party members since he is low level and not an arch class. We continue in with early in the story these 3 driving things ahead- often forcing the situations that lead Kazuma to progress or at times even supporting him or saving him in various ways such as when he dies and is resurrected. The company and friendship he gains from them is critical in both his mental health

The “I’m too smart to be smart” strikes again!
It is entirely possible the bowls contained different amounts of porridge and/or were different sizes and materials- it is generally not specified, so it is unknown. The specifics of the container and the total mass of material can impact the temperature of the porridge after a tule left sitting. This also ignores other distinct possibilities-
1. The porridge did not begin the same temperature in each bowl. We do not know the timing by which the porridge was placed in each bowl- it could either have been an intentional decision based on the family members (when we had a baby at home we would plate hot food for the baby and let it sit so that it was cool by the time we all sat to eat for example) or unintentional such as being distracted while setting out the bowls.
2. In that same vein- depending on the method of cooking and composition the porridge in the pot could be different temperatures at different points, meaning that depending

Yes and no. Some things are actually on the sum total worse to keep in service- many older machines are woefully inefficient. You have yo calculate the resource costs to make an item and compare that to the life time use resource costs. So for example, electric vehicles have HUGE up front resource costs but over a span of continuous service for several decades- they will consume very few resources compared to most petrol and diesel vehicles. Of course in that example, the average electric car will likely not last long enough to actually make back the initial resource investment unless you put an obscene amount of miles on it- and if you put on miles you wouldn’t have put on if you didn’t have the electric car that too is a waste of resources comparatively. So repairing a 1989 Honda civic CRX base with its near 50mpg would likely be good for the environment and your wallet but keeping that 1965 F250 running probably less so.