It’s asking for your gender. Not your physical sex, not your orientation, not even your expression. Why would it include asexuality?
I think there are great conversations to be had about how things currently associated with gender could be recategorised, but this is, as you say, a real half-baked way to go about it.

I’m the one downvoting you. You think you’re so entitled to an explanation you can’t even see what’s right in front of you. Stop dog whistling.
Forgot to add: I use neo pronouns. I don’t identify with the gender binary. I’m the hypothetical person you’re talking about.

That’s what I was asking you about. What third and beyond genders are you familiar with? I haven’t encountered any yet and would love to learn about the ones you have.
Edit to add: the graph is reductive because the concept is reductive. Even cultures that name additional genders frame them in the context of masculine, feminine, or the absence thereof. I don’t fault the graph for not breaking new ground on concepts that humans haven’t even been able to really articulate.

But not being on those spectrums is right there at 0,0. That’s what that means. Neither.

Let’s say we added an axis for “over time” to help out the fluid folks, what else would you put as additional axis? Help me out here because I hover near the 0,0 (agender, with some residual ingrained biases), but I’m really not very familiar with other non-binary expressions.

Considering that it lets you choose anywhere from “null both” to “strong both”, it covers the spectrum pretty well.

I stumbled on dyscalculia by accident, I think. But a lifetime of face blindness, counting on my fingers, inability to read maps, inability to do math in my head, and utter failure at spatial reasoning all fits >.<

I worry about him in the long run. Is there sufficient demand for his business? Does he have the support he needs to run a business? Does he have a plan for dealing with problematic customers and staff?