Comments
Follow Comments Sorted by time
deleted
· 2 years ago
· FIRST
This is not about "group based gult", in case you REALLY don't get that. It's about awareness and respect.
▼
deleted
· 2 years ago
I didn't understand the "meme", I didn't understand the title, I didn't understand your comment. The brainrot is setting in
deleted
· 2 years ago
brainrot may cause ignorance.
▼
Show All
creativedragonbaby
· 2 years ago
It's almost as if making generalisations that villainize 50% of the population is a *bad* thing... hmmm.
3
deleted
· 2 years ago
That's a common misunderstanding of that concept. "Villainizing 50% of the population" is a Strawman if there ever was one. Doesn't change the fact that women have way more reason to be afraid of men than the other way round.
1
creativedragonbaby
· 2 years ago
Oh for sure women are in more danger statistically. That doesn't mean we need to put down one gender. Women are just as capable of violence, and looking only at statistics denies male victims.
1
deleted
· 2 years ago
Oh please give me a break here. This isn't even about domestic violence where there is a significant number of cases of female violence against men (still HUGE differences in numbers and especially in degree but let's focus here). This is about what can (and DOES) happen outside. When it comes to violence in public, these numbers are very, very different and statistics reflect that. When it comes to numbers, what would you be looking at but statistics? There are numbers on male violence against females. There are numbers of male violence agains males. There are statistics of female violence against females. And there are numbers of female violence against males. Where's the denial of male victims? Who's "putting down one gender" when these numbers describe a very real situation? Who does that except for 39 idiots on Twatter? Strawman all the effing way. This is not blaming one gender, its men trying to make OTHER FELLOW men aware. Where else would change be coming from?
▼
deleted
· 2 years ago
effing