Comments
Follow Comments Sorted by time
shipssailhigh
· 10 years ago
· FIRST
I'm British what happened exactly can someone explain please?
9
grammarnazi1
· 10 years ago
America did the thing.
18
italianconditioner
· 10 years ago
America did the thing hard.
10
Show All
frostbite
· 10 years ago
GW said not to split up into different political parties because it will be bad. Then the U.S. did exactly that.
14
shipssailhigh
· 10 years ago
Thanks frostbite
7
sadtruth
· 10 years ago
But no matter what it would have happend
▼
guest
· 10 years ago
Guys...
guest
· 10 years ago
I love sassy Washington
2
bad_wolf
· 10 years ago
He looks so done...
guest
· 9 years ago
He also said to stay neutral but "oh no!" war happened!
guest
· 10 years ago
Political parties actually saves america from one party dominance and dictatorships. No party will ever totally dominate but at the expense of drama and stalements
▼
seabreezemcchicken
· 10 years ago
Can somebody explain the dislikes? I'm severely confused.
·
Edited 10 years ago
kurukuruguy
· 10 years ago
The would be no one party dominance if there were no parties. Rather then everybody splitting into groups with specific wants and agendas, we just have presidents with no specific alignment. We are already technically dominated by 2 big parties, and our candidates are pretty much limited to two. With no specific party attributed to people, we don't have just two people from 2 specific parties to choose from. Although I understand there are already other candidates, the 2 parties are so dominant that it's pointless to vote for anyone else. Without parties as well, presidents can go about with the best plan without fear of losing their party's support. Who would normally be a republican can now vote for greener energy and not be religious without being attacked by members of his/her party for it. Sure favorite candidates will still exist, and sure it might make voting harder. But it's not as if without splitting, we have one party with one specific agenda.
kurukuruguy
· 10 years ago
Instead, we'd have many together with millions of different ideas to choose from. We don't have people with different ideas separating, and they don't have to agree on a specific set of ideas to support or disapprove.
1