World class violinist plays in public but no one really cared
10 years ago by pup3 · 3327 Likes · 12 comments · Popular
Report
Comments
Follow Comments Sorted by time
metalman
· 10 years ago
· FIRST
My apologies but whether this man is the best violinist in the world or not is an opinion. Now with that being said eveyone has different tastes in music and in what they perceive as beautiful therefore to say that no one stops to smell the roses is completely arbitrary. No one may stop to smell your roses but they would rather smell their own.
23
pokethebear
· 10 years ago
Yes and no. Musicians are judged by the precise way they play a composition. Information including tempo, duration, tone etc is all laid out concisely on sheet music. The ability of a musician to perform a piece as the composer intended is quantifiable. You are right in that the quality of the piece bring played is objective.
3
taeminnieah
· 10 years ago
I'm a music student, and I understand that people have places to go, appointments, schedules
24
lecomte
· 10 years ago
I'm goingng to see him preform next Friday :)))
6
guest
· 10 years ago
People have things to do you know. Doesn't make them unappreciative or bad people.
27
guest
· 10 years ago
Would he or the reporter "stop and smell the roses " if they had to be somewhere on time?
19
guest
· 10 years ago
32$ in 45 minutes are pretty great and the experiment would be more worthing if he did it in a park or somewhere you go to when you have time to stop and listen
11
guest
· 10 years ago
Thats nice but Bitch I'm late for work
12
n8funny
· 10 years ago
maybe, they just didnt know
▼
metalman
· 10 years ago
Knowing isn't the point. The point is that people don't have time to listen to the beautiful things in life. Whereas I think its an arbitrary article because mot everyone cares for classical music.
niriel
· 10 years ago
There are other factors here. 1: the feeling of being forced to give money. "I did something nice for you without your consent, now pay me". It's very awkward, if not rude. If you don't want to reward this kind of racket/blackmail, or if you can't give anything because you're short on cash, then the only vaguely polite way out is to not acknowledge the music and the musician. 2: it's awkward to stay and stare at someone who's struggling so much in life he has to perform in the metro; it's like you're taking advantage of this guy's misery somehow. Points 1 and 2 are somehow contradictory: the listener is exploiting and being exploited at the same time; social inequalities suck, you feel and think of that while listening to the music, it spoils everything.
1
guest
· 10 years ago
There's time and place for everything. This wasn't either
▼