Dat animation

11 years ago by guest · 2463 Likes · 19 comments · Popular

Report

Comments

Show More Comments

1967impala · 11 years ago · FIRST

But aren't these two very different types if animation? It still falls under the category of animation, but wasn't Life of Pi CGI? And the first one of course was actual animation, like a cartoon. Sorry if I sound rude... I just wanted to say something.

songofthewhitestag · 11 years ago

CGI is still animation. Just as difficult as drawing it by hand. Actually... Scratch that. MORE difficult than drawing it.

▼

1967impala · 11 years ago

Thank you for telling me. c:

guest · 11 years ago

They both are difficult but they're pretty different mediums as well. The new CGI technology is incredible but it's not like the animators got that much better at drawing in the same way the first tiger is drawn.

guest · 11 years ago

They should have set up better examples.. Such as two screenshots of movies that BOTH used CGI in 1992 and in 2012.

4 Reply

blaze · 11 years ago

CGI is just brilliant nowadays

5 Reply

batgirl · 11 years ago

They were both great movies

1 Reply · Edited 11 years ago

mrssparklez · 11 years ago

No. Richard Parker is real.

9 Reply

guest · 11 years ago

I suddenly have the urge to see every Disney movie rewritten and screened in CGI, starting with Aladdin

sophi · 11 years ago

Please don't do this, it reminds me of my age.

1 Reply

quirkycupcake · 11 years ago

Wait that was animated? I thought it was c.g.

songofthewhitestag · 11 years ago

CGI is animation.

▼ Reply

mira · 11 years ago

i thought that was real ,like a real tiger !

deleted · 11 years ago

It is a real bengal tiger guys.

songofthewhitestag · 11 years ago

No, it's not. It's computer generated. Amazing isn't it? How realistic we can make things? Bengals aren't quite so pale, though. There's a bit more orange to them. Less yellow.

▼

mrssparklez · 11 years ago

No. Richard Parker is real.

3 more replies hidden. Show All

Dat animation

Comments

Featured Posts