Oh MY GOSH, he's a smol boi but he's so stronk <3<3<3 thanks @happy_frog

WE WERE THIS CLOSE TO ACHIEVING PERFECTION

True

Yes. Thanks for the heads up ~

I found this wiki page comparing the two and reading the differences is giving me a stroke
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_the_imperial_and_US_customary_measurement_systems

Huh. makes sense. i always conflate the two.

mood

That's a valid way of looking at it.

not until my fellow compatriots agree that the METRIC DEFINED US. Imperial system is inferior

gg ez

So I can experience last minute regret before i fade out of existence that sounds exhausting

Touché

Hey I never said ALL information clans.

The answer i found, although my interpretation isn't as descriptive, was that reuleaux triangles are the shape that cover the most area when rotating inside a square, and that many rounded objects can spin inside and at least touch all four sides, the reuleaux triangle matches a square the best, not perfectly because it rounds off the corners. the device shown takes advantage of that by placing the cutting blades exactly on the corners of the rounded triangle and placing that inside the rounded square path it would take. as well as making it spin off center.